1. Legal Process Necessity: Remote monitoring is limited to court orders. It cannot be done without a court order.
2. Time limit: Remote monitoring is done for the duration of the legal action, i.e. for a limited period of time when the crime is suspected.
3. Limitation of data subject to monitoring: Remote monitoring is only permitted to collect evidence of explicit crimes, i.e. data on offenses prohibited by criminal law. For example, criminals cannot monitor their smartphones to see if they are secretly collecting personal information.
4. Surveillance Costs and Burdens: Actual surveillance requires personnel and technical support, so costs will be allocated at the discretion of the National Police Agency.
Subject to these restrictions, police officers can remotely monitor smartphones subject to surveillance. 0065考える名無しさん2023/05/06(土) 21:11:09.680https://itest.5ch.net/lavender/test/read.cgi/philo/1683362798/l500066考える名無しさん2023/05/06(土) 21:14:34.870 Japanese police fabricate an unusual investigation period and remotely monitor people's location information, privacy, and these for a long period of time as a hobby. It is a severe violation of privacy and human rights. 0067考える名無しさん2023/05/06(土) 21:16:55.030 Despite not being in the middle of a criminal investigation 0068考える名無しさん2023/05/06(土) 21:33:28.560 Japan's detention hell is famous Weighing that fear cooperate with us for many years i'm watching you and apply invisible pressure but i haven't received a penny rather exhausted I am a volunteer all my life if not exploited by the police Shouldn't it? 0069考える名無しさん2023/05/06(土) 21:41:48.670 あんたにとってだってこんなレスする奴は俺しかいないはずだ