>>294
> those acts of freeloading can only be made at the expenses of others
That's not true as well.
For example, imagine there is one person who pays and one who just downloads. The first pays, say, $1, and the publisher gets $1, and the other one pays nothing.
Now imagine there is one who pays and ten persons who download. The publisher will get $1 as before, and 10 persons will get their beloved content for free, but the one who pays will pay $1 - just as before.
So you can't say that those 10 people get what they want at his expenses, because the amount that he pays didn't change.

Pretty simple arithmetics, my friend.