最近、「王桜起源論争」が熱い。東京上野公園で発見されソメイヨシノと呼ばれる王桜に1901年、Prunus yedoensisという学名がつけられて、済州の漢拏山自生地で発見された王桜に1912年、Prunusyedoensis var nudifloraという学名が付けられたが、形態が類似して肉眼で区別することが難しかった。これで、済州王桜1種と東京王桜1種の起源論争が最近まで花形などの形態分析、母系である葉緑体遺伝子分析、全体遺伝体分析によって進められた。
Origin debates In 1908, a French missionary Taquet discovered a native cherry in Jeju islands, Korea and in 1912 a German botanist Koehne gave it a scientific name Prunus yedoensis var. nudiflora.[27] Although this species called Eishu zakura is a variation of Yoshino cherry ('Somei-yoshino'), from then it was misrepresented that Yoshino cherry was growing naturally in Jeju Island.[28] In 1933, the Japanese botanist Gen'ichi Koizumi reported that Yoshino cherry originated on Jeju island, South Korea.[28] Koreans claimed that the Japanese stole Yoshino cherry from South Korea at the time of Japanese annexation of Korea. In 1962, Yo Takenaka ruled out the possibility of Korean origin by the morphological study.[23][29] In 1995 DNA fingerprinting technology was used to conclude that Yoshino cherry grown in many parts of Japan under the name Prunus × yedoensis is indeed clonally propagated from the same hybrid offspring of Prunus lannesiana (Oshima cherry) and Prunus pendula (Edo higan),[5] which confirms the 1991 conclusion given by Iwasaki Fumio that Prunus × yedoensis originated around 1720–1735 by artificial crossing of these species in Edo (Tokyo).[30] Oshima cherry is an endemic species found only around Izu Islands, Izu and Bōsō Peninsulas not around Korean Peninsula.[31][32] In 2007, a study conducted on the comparison of Japanese Yoshino cherry and Korean King cherry concluded that the trees native to these two places can be categorized as distinct species.[17] It was confirmed that South Korea's claim was false. In 2016, the phylogenetic analysis of nrDNA ITS data and the cpDNA haplotype network analysis suggested that independent origin between King cherry and yoshino cherry, respectively.[33] In 2016, a new scientific name Cerasus × nudiflora was given to King cherry to distinguish it from Yoshino cherry (Prunus × yedoensis).[34] 0038<丶`∀´>(´・ω・`)(`ハ´ )さん2022/04/21(木) 00:17:58.79ID:Si1ISJ6p 英語のwiki見ても韓国人は主張はDNAテストによって否定されたと書いてあって草w
Origin debates In 1908, a French missionary Taquet discovered a native cherry in Jeju islands, Korea and in 1912 a German botanist Koehne gave it a scientific name Prunus yedoensis var. nudiflora.[27] Although this species called Eishu zakura is a variation of Yoshino cherry ('Somei-yoshino'), from then it was misrepresented that Yoshino cherry was growing naturally in Jeju Island.[28] In 1933, the Japanese botanist Gen'ichi Koizumi reported that Yoshino cherry originated on Jeju island, South Korea.[28] Koreans claimed that the Japanese stole Yoshino cherry from South Korea at the time of Japanese annexation of Korea. In 1962, Yo Takenaka ruled out the possibility of Korean origin by the morphological study.[23][29] In 1995 DNA fingerprinting technology was used to conclude that Yoshino cherry grown in many parts of Japan under the name Prunus × yedoensis is indeed clonally propagated from the same hybrid offspring of Prunus lannesiana (Oshima cherry) and Prunus pendula (Edo higan),[5] which confirms the 1991 conclusion given by Iwasaki Fumio that Prunus × yedoensis originated around 1720–1735 by artificial crossing of these species in Edo (Tokyo).[30] Oshima cherry is an endemic species found only around Izu Islands, Izu and Bōsō Peninsulas not around Korean Peninsula.[31][32] In 2007, a study conducted on the comparison of Japanese Yoshino cherry and Korean King cherry concluded that the trees native to these two places can be categorized as distinct species.[17] It was confirmed that South Korea's claim was false. In 2016, the phylogenetic analysis of nrDNA ITS data and the cpDNA haplotype network analysis suggested that independent origin between King cherry and yoshino cherry, respectively.[33] In 2016, a new scientific name Cerasus × nudiflora was given to King cherry to distinguish it from Yoshino cherry (Prunus × yedoensis).[34] 0039<丶`∀´>(´・ω・`)(`ハ´ )さん2022/04/21(木) 00:18:36.96ID:aZUImaZ4 陰謀論者を論破しても無駄 彼らは事実を欲していない むしろ事実を突きつけると、真実()を主張し出す 0040<丶`∀´>(´・ω・`)(`ハ´ )さん2022/04/21(木) 00:19:05.22ID:68sSNHNO さっさと日韓国交断絶しようぜ 0041<丶`∀´>(´・ω・`)(`ハ´ )さん2022/04/21(木) 00:19:09.44ID:OvJU2IVM>>26 科学的考察って以前に、現場を知らない人が自分の妄想の桜論を述べてるだけだからな