The decision method currently used by MBTI is If the examinee receives the questionnaire provided by MBTI (self-recognition checklist on the questionnaire) and recognizes it as the correct type, it is unconditionally regarded as the correct answer as the native type It is just a mechanism. Although it is marketed in publicity phrases such as global standards, there is no academic basis for this mechanism itself *
Moreover, at the stage of not taking the test, it is "I do not know", and it is premised that the type judgment is not something that others do, but that the person himself chooses
At least the current MBTI is a tool that regards self-awareness (what you think of yourself) as an innate type. If you are doing type determination of others from the standpoint of not supporting MBTI, typology side If you are typing in another person in support of MBTI, you are misunderstanding the treatment of typology in MBTI Academically, it is only possible to determine whether or not a person is of the exact type by nature through another survey
▪About trademarks▪ MBTI is a trademark of Myers and Briggs Foundation, Inc. It is not a generic name. Only right holders and licensed persons can make a diagnosis under MBTI. ** Difference between trademark and patent MBTI is a trademark. Not a patent. Please note that the theories and psychological function abbreviations in the 16 types, each type represented by 4 characters, etc. are not MBTI-specific products and services You cannot borrow eaves (MBTI is one of the 16 types of goods and services) and get a purlin (generalized name for 16 types)
* This text was posted on a thread with similar issues Thank you for your recognition 0275没個性化されたレス↓2020/03/10(火) 05:19:43.03 [誤解に関する注意事項] *
The decision method currently used by MBTI is If the examinee receives the questionnaire provided by MBTI (self-recognition checklist on the questionnaire) and recognizes it as the correct type, it is unconditionally regarded as the correct answer as the native type It is just a mechanism. Although it is marketed in publicity phrases such as global standards, there is no academic basis for this mechanism itself *
Moreover, at the stage of not taking the test, it is "I do not know", and it is premised that the type judgment is not something that others do, but that the person himself chooses
At least the current MBTI is a tool that regards self-awareness (what you think of yourself) as an innate type. If you are doing type determination of others from the standpoint of not supporting MBTI, typology side If you are typing in another person in support of MBTI, you are misunderstanding the treatment of typology in MBTI Academically, it is only possible to determine whether or not a person is of the exact type by nature through another survey
▪About trademarks▪ MBTI is a trademark of Myers and Briggs Foundation, Inc. It is not a generic name. Only right holders and licensed persons can make a diagnosis under MBTI. ** Difference between trademark and patent MBTI is a trademark. Not a patent. Please note that the theories and psychological function abbreviations in the 16 types, each type represented by 4 characters, etc. are not MBTI-specific products and services You cannot borrow eaves (MBTI is one of the 16 types of goods and services) and get a purlin (generalized name for 16 types)
* This text was posted on a thread with similar issues Thank you for your recognition 0278没個性化されたレス↓2020/03/10(火) 05:29:56.27 [誤解に関する注意事項] *
The decision method currently used by MBTI is If the examinee receives the questionnaire provided by MBTI (self-recognition checklist on the questionnaire) and recognizes it as the correct type, it is unconditionally regarded as the correct answer as the native type It is just a mechanism. Although it is marketed in publicity phrases such as global standards, there is no academic basis for this mechanism itself *
Moreover, at the stage of not taking the test, it is "I do not know", and it is premised that the type judgment is not something that others do, but that the person himself chooses
At least the current MBTI is a tool that regards self-awareness (what you think of yourself) as an innate type. If you are doing type determination of others from the standpoint of not supporting MBTI, typology side If you are typing in another person in support of MBTI, you are misunderstanding the treatment of typology in MBTI Academically, it is only possible to determine whether or not a person is of the exact type by nature through another survey
▪About trademarks▪ MBTI is a trademark of Myers and Briggs Foundation, Inc. It is not a generic name. Only right holders and licensed persons can make a diagnosis under MBTI. ** Difference between trademark and patent MBTI is a trademark. Not a patent. Please note that the theories and psychological function abbreviations in the 16 types, each type represented by 4 characters, etc. are not MBTI-specific products and services You cannot borrow eaves (MBTI is one of the 16 types of goods and services) and get a purlin (generalized name for 16 types)
* This text was posted on a thread with similar issues Thank you for your recognition 0281没個性化されたレス↓2020/03/10(火) 05:40:09.60 [誤解に関する注意事項] *
